Services
Technology Web App Development Mobile App Development Windows App Development Database Development UI/UX Development Cloud Development SEO Digital Marketing Guest Posting Content Writing Artificial Intelligence Data Science ERP Development CRM Development CMS Development LMS Development Business Listing Blockchain Technology Startup Promotion AI Tools Integration
Products
Data Converter Cleaner TUC - Unit Converter Import Export Survey Manager Tweet Controller
Developer
Article Blog Forum Interview Beginner News Startup Quiz
Users
Career
Apply Job Internship
Pricing
Login Sign Up Get a Quote

forum

home / developersection / forums / ado.net transaction when command's transaction is not set
Ask Question

ADO.Net Transaction when Command's transaction is not set

Anonymous User 3157 19 Jun 2013
Hi Expert, 

I came across a sample on ADO.Net, where a transaction was being done without setting the command's transaction property as in code below.

Is this possible Or one needs to explicitly set the command's transaction property?

// Start a local transaction.
SqlTransaction sqlTran = connection.BeginTransaction();

// Enlist a command in the current transaction.
 SqlCommand command = connection.CreateCommand();
-----
-----
sqlTran.Commit()

Any help on above is really appreciated.
ado.net ado.net
Updated 19 Jun 2013
Anonymous User
Anonymous User

Other

I am a content writter !

Message

1 Answers

Sumit Kesarwani
Sumit Kesarwani 19 Jun 2013
Report Abuse
Hi Tanuj,

That should throw a runtime exception. That is, if you have an active transaction on a SqlConnection and do not assign a reference to the corresponding SqlTransaction to the SqlCommand.Transaction property and attempt to execute the command, you should get an exception.

In short, set the Transaction property explicitly when executing a command on a connection with an active transaction.

MindStick Training