To date, the problem of higher education is one of the most relevant and plays an important role in building trust between citizens and the state. Many political leaders use higher education as a tool for obtaining additional electoral votes and promise a greater level of freedom in this area. But what is the real situation with free education?

There are different systems of access to knowledge. In economically developed countries, it is predominantly or partially paid for both residents and citizens. Unfortunately, not all people have a financial opportunity to purchase the educational services. In some cases, it is possible to obtain a scholarship through public budgetary funds on a competitive basis.

Today, globalization plays a key role in the development of the world economy, and higher education cannot do without international integration. Internships, joint research between universities of different countries are necessary for the continuous development of the educational process and the achievement of the highest results. The progressive studies require significant investments, and educational institutions should allocate huge funds for more active international cooperation.

The question arises: who should sponsor all these reforms? Students or a state? Is it permissible to turn education into the business and earn on the desire of young people to study?

Harsh reality: free education and commerce

When entering modern prestigious universities, candidates face a number of problems. The main of them are listed below.

• Most educational institutions have switched to a mixed scheme, according to which one part of students studies for free, and the second part consists of those who acquire a knowledge on a commercial basis, that is, they pay for tuition. The situation is aggravated by the fact that the prices constantly grow.
• It is not difficult to get to a paid training course, and the learning itself is much easier. But in many universities, it is almost impossible to study on a free basis, at least, more difficult than several decades ago. Although some students successfully pass exams for free education, that is, contrary to many rumors, it is still real.
• It's no secret that the free education is often based on corruption, that is, frank extortion when passing exams, tests. Even the essays ordered at authoritative college paper writing services can be severely criticized. The teachers look for fictitious errors in order to get a bribe from a student. In many ways, such disorder poisons the learning process. In recent years, it became more difficult to take exams, even for the students who treat the study very seriously. All this is especially offensive, because even free education turns into business.
• Some universities have already completely eliminated the free education at separate faculties and departments, while others make the possibility of budgetary admission almost impracticable.

Today, many parents understand the situation and are initially focused on training on a commercial program. Such an approach has its advantages: there are much more opportunities for those who are really serious about studying, at least in choosing the disciplines that a given person really needs (of course, if at the young age, he is already able to determine what is needed, but this is not always so). Advocates of paid education claim that it provides more independence, tranquility, and confidence that you will not be expelled for underachieving.

They also cite the following argument: for some reason, people usually much more appreciate the things for which they pay a lot of money. For example, if all people would study free of charge, both at schools and universities, the ability to gain knowledge will not be appreciated at all. And when a sufficient percentage of idlers (that is, those who do not appreciate knowledge, treat it scornfully, with frank disrespect, or even worse, with disdain) is present in the classroom or in the teaching staff, they often set the general atmosphere.

Yes, there is a grain of wisdom in these arguments, but not in the cases when parents do not have money to pay for education of their child. The young people simply do not have the opportunity to show their talents.

And yet, what to strive for?

This question - whether the education should be paid or free - worries the public for a long time. Several years ago, many experts asserted that paid knowledge has significant advantages, and even that such a system is optimal. Now, the views have changed somewhat.

In the cities of the United States (and not only in cities), there are many talented young people, but one problem exists: there is nothing to pay for tuition. It means only one thing: the possibility of obtaining a higher education will be crossed out for such children.

As a result, our country will lose the opportunity to receive a large number of qualified specialists. There will be nobody to develop science, technology, economy, culture. There will be no new discoveries, implementations, sensible leaders. Isn’t all this a direct threat to the security of the state? We will not be afraid to answer that this threat is obvious.

But there is a second problem. What about morality? What about the laws declaring the right to education? A person cannot be deprived of his legitimate right to gain a profession just because his parents do not have money - there are no such restrictions under the basic law. Is it humane? Consequently, any attempts to make education completely paid will be in obvious contradiction with morality and law.

It seems that we still need to find a golden mean - something about 50/50. Part of the students should study for free, another part - on a commercial basis. And, of course, management of educational institutions should follow the attitude towards learning more carefully. If some young people study for free languidly, without enthusiasm, it is necessary to get rid of such students and give way to really hardworking, ambitious personalities.

It is important to note that the problem of paid and free education is closely connected with the issue of paid and free medicine. The answer is obvious here. A strong state should provide significant budgetary expenses for the maintenance of free medicine. Otherwise, it may turn into a criminal syndicate that will seize the population. The doctors will treat not people but their illnesses and turn a noble vocation into a business.