forum

Home / DeveloperSection / Forums / How clustered and non-clustered indexes impact query performance.

Ask Question
Revati S Misra

Revati S Misra

Follow
Skilled in SEO, content writing, and digital marketing. Completed several years of working in many organizations including multinational companies. I love to learn new things in life that keep me motivated.

Can you answer this question?

Answer

1 Answers

Aryan Kumar

Aryan Kumar

27-Oct-2023

Clustered and non-clustered indexes are two types of indexes used in a relational database management system (RDBMS) like SQL Server. They impact query performance in different ways, and their use depends on the nature of the query and the specific requirements of your database. Here's how clustered and non-clustered indexes affect query performance:

Clustered Index:

Physical Data Order: A clustered index determines the physical order of data rows in a table. In other words, the rows are physically sorted in the same order as the clustered index key.

Unique: A table can have only one clustered index, and by default, it enforces uniqueness on the indexed column(s).

Primary Key: In many cases, the primary key of a table is implemented as a clustered index. This enforces the uniqueness of the primary key and physically sorts the data.

Query Performance:

  • Excellent for range queries: Clustered indexes are well-suited for queries that involve range searches or equality comparisons on the indexed column(s).
  • Fast retrieval of entire rows: Because the data rows are physically stored in the order of the clustered index, retrieving an entire row based on the index key is efficient.

Insert, Update, and Delete Performance:

  • Inserting new rows can be slower, as data may need to be reorganized to maintain the physical order of the index.
  • Updating the clustered index key can be slow for similar reasons.
  • Deleting rows can be faster, as the data is already physically ordered.

Non-Clustered Index:

Logical Order: A non-clustered index does not dictate the physical order of data; instead, it creates a separate structure that stores a copy of the indexed column(s) along with a reference to the data rows.

Multiple Indexes: A table can have multiple non-clustered indexes, allowing for efficient access to data based on various criteria.

Query Performance:

  • Efficient for specific lookups: Non-clustered indexes are excellent for queries that need to look up individual rows based on the indexed column(s).
  • Useful for covering queries: Non-clustered indexes can "cover" a query by including all the columns needed in the query, reducing the need to access the actual data rows.

Insert, Update, and Delete Performance:

  • Inserting new rows is generally faster, as there is no need to reorder the data.
  • Updating the indexed column(s) is typically faster.
  • Deleting rows is similar in performance to clustered indexes.

In summary, the choice between clustered and non-clustered indexes depends on your specific use case:

Clustered Index: Use when you need to physically order the data rows or enforce the uniqueness of a primary key. It's best for range queries and for retrieving entire rows efficiently.

Non-Clustered Index: Use when you need to optimize specific lookups or cover specific queries with a subset of columns. You can have multiple non-clustered indexes on a table to support various query patterns.

In practice, it's common to use a combination of clustered and non-clustered indexes to optimize different aspects of query performance in a database.

MindStick Training

Liked By