A Leakage in Gas Flares were Five Times More Than Methane Previously
In several oil and gas manufacturing regions the flames eventually lighten up the sky. The flares actually burn off 98 percent of the escaping natural gas, oil and gas firms claim. However, the observations of three U.S. oil and gas fields would show that the efficiency would be only around 91 percent. Well, making up the distinction would be the equivalent of taking nearly three million cars off the road.
HIGHLIGHTS
- Observations of 3 U.S. oil and gas fields show the efficiency would be only 91%
- A drop from 98 to 91 percent efficiency seemed small but the effects were huge
- Half of the distinction happened because of flares which were not burning
The natural gas escaping would primarily be methane. This greenhouse gas lingers for only nine to ten years within the atmosphere, but it has a warming potential which would be around 80 times that of carbon dioxide. Therefore, the oil and gas firms would light the flares with the burning of methane to provide less-potent carbon dioxide and water. The industry and the U.S. government had assumed that those flares would work at 98% efficiency. But, according to the previous studies it may be too optimistic, as mentioned by Genevieve Plant, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.
Plant and her colleagues have sent planes to sample air over 300 flares within the Bakken Basin in North Dakota and also the Permian and Eagle Ford basins in Texas itself. It would account for over 80% of the flaring within the country. The samples have displayed five times the as much the methane would unburned than previously it was estimated.
Well, there was a drop from 98 to 91 percent efficiency which may appear to be small, but the effects were large as it was mentioned by Dan Cusworth, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Arizona in Tucson who was actually not a part of the study. Well, “Any percentage which would be present in the methane phase rather than of CO2 phase would be considered as more problematic.”
Though, half of the distinction was because of flares which were not burning. As per Plant, “We had expected that flares may show a variety of efficiencies, however we had not expected to check such a big amount of unlit flares.” In between 3 to 5 percent of flares were not at all functioning. If those fires were lit, and it had achieved 98 percent efficiency, this was such that the result could remove the equivalent of around 13 million metric tons of carbon from atmosphere.
Also Read: NTPC Projects to Light Up 2 Lakh Households with Reduction of CO2 Emissions